Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures - Sean Symons 26/10/2004
Displaced proximal humeral fractures
Part 1. Classification and Evaluation
Neer CS. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 52-A: 1077-1089
Retrospective study of 300 displaced proximal humeral fractures/fracture-dislocations 1953-1967 New York Hospital-Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Centre.
No useful classification system available
Four-segment classification developed;
Not based upon level of fracture (anatomical/surgical neck) or mechanism of injury.
Group 1, Minimum Displacement
No segment displaced more than 1cm or 45
°
85% of proximal humeral fractures
Early mobilisation
Group 2; Articular-segment Displacement
Anatomical neck separation only
Rare
May lead to malunion or AVN
Group 3; Shaft Displacement
Surgical neck; Angulated & impacted – closed reduction possible
Separation – pec major displaces shaft anteromedially
Comminution
Group 4; Greater Tuberosity Displacement
Involves tear of rotator cuff usually at rotator interval
3-part # - articular segment is internally rotated by subscapularis preventing closed reduction. Good blood supply.
4-part # articular segment loses blood supply via soft tissue attachments.
Group 5, Lesser Tuberosity Displacement
3-part # - articular segment is externally rotated & abducted by supraspinatus & infraspinatus preventing closed reduction. Good blood supply.
4-part # articular segment loses blood supply via soft tissue attachments.
Group6, Fracture-Dislocation
Antero-inferior or posterior
2 & 3 -part # humeral head maintains good blood supply
4-part # are associated with neurovascular injuries
Include displaced fractures of the articular surface (head splitting #)
When >20% of articular surface is involved redislocation occurs requiring transplantation of subscapularis tendon into defect
When >50% of articular surface is involved Hemiarthroplasty required to regain stability.
X-rays
2 views 90
°
to each other; AP 30
°
to saggital plane
Lateral in line of scapula
Displaced proximal humeral fractures
Part 2. Treatment of Three-part and Four-part Displacement
Neer CS. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 52-A: 1090-1103
117 patients with 3-part or 4-part # of proximal humerus
Average age = 55.3 years
Patients assessed by Scoring System out of 100 units (satisfactory=80)
Recommendations of treatment;
Closed reduction – only for 3-part # with low activity
Open-reduction – only for 3-part # with poor results due to poor surgical technique
Prosthesis – few complications
only for 4-part #
Problems with treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in Adults:
Interventions for Treating Proximal Humeral Fractures in Adults
Cochrane Review, Handoll HHG August 2003
Proximal humeral fractures = 4-5% of all fractures
Incidence increases with age
2F:M
Osteoporosis
Please log in to view the content of this page. If you are having problems logging in, please refer to the login help page. |
|||
|
|||
|
|