Unicondylar Knee Replacement - OWLS 2 26/10/2001
-
Advantages over TKR
:
1. Preservation of bone stock
2. Preservation of ACL, Lateral compartment and PF joint
3. Preservation of kinematics and proprioception of knee
4. Easy to revise to TKR
-
Compared to High Tibial osteotomy
1. Higher rate of early and long term success
2. Fewer early post op complications
3. No immobilization; earlier return to full mobility
4. Uni is more likely to increase ROM (remove adhesions/osteophytes)
5. Easier conversion to TKR
-
Demanding to get resection and placement just right
-
Excessive wear and loosening has been a historical problem. ( Incongrous surfaces need at least 8mm to withstand high pressures which result from high pressure areas)
-
-
Oxford Uni
provides congruous articular surfaces with areas of about 6 sq. cm in all positions.
Insall J, Aglietti P
A five to seven year follow up of unicondylar arthroplasty
22 (from 32) knees, average age 66 (47-80), 25 medial and 7 lateral, 1excellent, 7 good, 4 fair and 10 poor; 7 revised (4 Tib. loose, 1 fem. loose, 2 OA progression). 18 patients had patellectomy > did worse. Lat did better than medial. Problems: component fixation, OA progression, patella, pain relief not as good as TKR.
Conclusions:
high tib osteotomy is better and only use may be in lateral disease.
Small numbers. No independent rad review. Selection criteria limited to medial OA, < 10 deg of FF, 90 deg of flexion. Patella excised if signs of PF OA (!)These poor results killed off the use of Uni's during much of the '80s
Please log in to view the content of this page. If you are having problems logging in, please refer to the login help page. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||
ACL |