External Fixation for Wrist Fractures - Rob Sneath - 27/3/2003
Author
|
Steffen (
Montreal
), Eugster and Jakob R.P.
|
Title
|
Twelve years follow-up of fractures treated with the AO external fixator
|
Reference
|
Injury 25:Suppl 4;S-D44-54 1994
|
Summary
|
32 pts with intra-articular fractures. Ave follow up 11.6yrs. Ave age 53.9yrs. 82% had C2 or C3 #'s. Rated for pain, motion, strength, deformity and X-Ray appearance. No clear progressive loss of movement over time. 75% did not show progressive OA changes. Over 2mm articular step - significant tendency to have OA and more severe type. Die-punch fragment not a predictor of OA. Wrist function mostly affected by radial shortening.
|
Critique
|
Longest follow up study. Small sample, different assessors, several surgeons. By their own admission final conclusions can not be drawn.
|
Author
|
Sommerkamp T. G. (
Dallas
), Seeman M., Silliman J., et al.
|
Title
|
Dynamic external fixation of unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius
|
Reference
|
JBJS 76-A:8;1149-1161 Aug 1994
|
Summary
|
Prospective randomised study comparing dynamic with static for unstable distal radial fractures. Clyburn dynamic fixator group “ 38 #'s ave age 34yrs. AO/ASIF group “ 37 #'s ave age 39yrs. High energy fractures selected. Fixators in both groups kept in position for 10 weeks. Assessed clinically and radiographically at 1, 6 and 12 months. Dynamic mobilisation of the wrist resulted in significant loss of radial length and an increased complication rate with no evidence of clinical benefit.
|
Critique
|
Very thorough methodology. Relatively small numbers. Group of young patients with high energy injuries makes comparison with other studies difficult.
|
Author
|
McQueen M. M. (
Edinburgh
), Hajducka C., and Court-Brown C. M.
|
Title
|
Redisplaced unstable fractures of the distal radius “ A prospective randomised comparison of four methods of treatment
|
Reference
|
JBJS 78-B:3;404-409 May 1996
|
Summary
|
30 patients in each group. Grp 1 “ forearm cast, Grp 2 “ open reduction and bone grafting. Grp 3 “ Pennig external fixator 6 weeks. Grp 4 “ Pennig fixator dynamised at 3 weeks for a total of 6 weeks. Assessed clinically and radiologically at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months. No difference in functional outcome
|
Take away message
|
No regime consistently restored palmar tilt and normal carpal alignment, which are probably the most important factors of outcome
|
Author
|
McQueen M. M. (
Edinburgh
)
|
Title
|
Redisplaced unstable fractures of the distal radius “ A randomised, prospective study of bridging
versus
non-bridging external fixation
|
Reference
|
JBJS 80-B:4;665-669 July 1998
|
Summary
|
Similar study design to her previous one with 60 pts this time. Non-bridging group had a significantly better radiological and functional outcome.
|
Take away message
|
Ligamentotaxis does not restore volar tilt with any certainty due to the short tough volar ligaments. Recommended if there is sufficient space in the distal fragment.
|
Please log in to view the content of this page. If you are having problems logging in, please refer to the login help page.
|