Clubfoot: Classification - Andrew Bucknill 14/8/2001
Brief
|
Catterall, RNOH
|
Clin.Orth.& Rel.Res.
|
1991
|
Title
|
A Method of Assessment of the Clubfoot Deformity
|
Authors
|
Catterall A
|
Reference
|
Clin.Orth.& Rel.Res. 1991 264: 49-53
|
Summary
|
Clinical assessment after failed conservative Mx -> "Resolving, Tendon Contracture, Joint Contracture, False Correction". Based on Hind foot Equinus, Lateral malleolus, Skin Creases, Forefoot (lateral border, mobility, cavus, supination).
|
Critique
|
Unintelligible, Not memorable, Not proven reliable or useful.
|
|
|
|
|
Brief
|
Harrold, St.Marys
|
JBJS (B)
|
1983
|
Title
|
Treatment & Prognosis in Congenital Club Foot
|
Authors
|
Harrold AJ, Walker CJ
|
Reference
|
JBJS 1983 65-B: 8-11
|
Summary
|
129 feet -> grades 1, 2 & 3 at presentation.Bad feet did worse. Serial splinting corrected 90% of grade 1, 50% grade 2 and 10% grade 3.Grade 1: foot can reach neutral. Grade 2 <20' from neutral. Grade 3 >20' fixed equinus or varus.
|
Critique
|
Useful clinically for prognosis. No testing of reproducability.
|
|
|
|
|
Brief
|
Dimeglio, Paris
|
J.Paed.Orth
|
1995
|
Title
|
Classification of Clubfoot
|
Authors
|
Dimeglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet Ph, Mazeau Ph, Bonnet F
|
Reference
|
J.Paed.Orth 1995 Part B: 4: 129-136
|
Summary
|
Scale of 0-20 on the basis of equinus, varus, derotation of calcaneo-forefoot block around talus, and adduction of forefoot on hindfoot.Four grades: 1, "soft-soft", mild, (1-5): 2, "soft>stiff", moderate, (5-10): 3, "stiff>soft", severe, (10-15): 4, "stiff-stiff", very severe, (15-20).
|
Critique
|
Not memorable, Untested in this paper
- tested later by someone else.
|
Please log in to view the content of this page. If you are having problems logging in, please refer to the login help page.
|